Original research · 2026

The State of UK Finance Broker Digital 2026

We put the public websites of 216 UK finance brokers through Google’s own mobile testing tool, the way a prospective borrower on a phone meets them: how fast the page loads, whether the firm can measure anything, how accessible the site is, and how easily it is found. Public information only, collected October 2026; 206 returned complete results. Free to cite with attribution to Credit Canary.

The whole sector, one chart

Only 12 of 206 brokers clear Google’s “good” bar for mobile speed

Every broker we assessed, placed by its Google mobile speed score. The band a site needs to reach is on the right. The median sits at 53.

Google’s good band90 and above0255075100Median 53VSLLCLNVACSCXVVBFLRSBCVCDLFVATLCLLVCLBLBCLVVLLCMURLVGBBPCPVJVKVHLSDASHMCVRSNVDAPSBVHLJFJHLSACSLDVC(FELFLLVMLEach tile is one broker at its Google mobile speed score (0–100). Hover for its name.
Key findings
86%
take longer than 4 seconds to show their main content on a mid-range phone
12 of 206
reach Google’s “good” band for mobile speed
53/100
the median mobile speed score, on the device most borrowers now use
33%
have no modern GA4 analytics, so marketing cannot be tied to borrowers won
27%
run no web analytics at all
65/100
the median digital health score across the set

Base: 206 UK finance brokers returning complete results from Google PageSpeed Insights (mobile), October 2026. Figures by Credit Canary.

What we found

86%

Mobile speed is the sector’s biggest gap

On Google’s mobile test, 86% of brokers took more than four seconds to render their main content, and the median mobile speed score was just 53 out of 100. Only 12 reached the good band, and 40% sat in the red. This is where a borrower on a phone decides whether to stay.

27% / 33%

Measurement is uneven

27% run no web analytics we could observe, and 33% have no modern GA4. 88% show no cookie-consent tool. Without measurement a lender cannot tell which channels bring borrowers or where applicants give up. (We only see tags that load without a consent click, so the true figure for the largest firms may be a little better.)

83/100

Findability is a relative strength

The median findability score was 83 out of 100 and only 15% lacked a useful meta description. The problem is rarely being found. It is what happens once a visitor arrives on a slow page.

68%

Accessibility has room to run

The median automated accessibility score was 86 out of 100, but 68% scored below 90, where common barriers start to lock people out. Accessibility is a duty under the Equality Act, and automated checks catch only a third to a half of real issues.

10 of 216

Some sites would not load for Google’s tool

10 of the 216 firms could not be loaded reliably by Google’s testing tool. Usually this points to aggressive bot-blocking rather than a site that is down, but the same defences can trip up legitimate services and some assistive technology.

Method and citation

All figures come from Credit Canary’s audit of 216 UK finance brokers with a live website, using public information only: each homepage was assessed with Google PageSpeed Insights on a mobile profile. Collected October 2026; 206 returned complete results and 10 could not be loaded reliably. This is passive analysis of what each site already shows every visitor. Speed uses Google’s simulated mid-tier phone on a throttled connection, a fair comparison between firms rather than an absolute load time. These are a prioritisation guide, not a verdict on any individual firm.

You are welcome to cite these figures with attribution to Credit Canary and a link to this page.

See where your business stands

Get a free, benchmarked report for your own firm: your mobile speed, your digital health score, your place in the table, and the changes worth making first.

Get your free report